Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese. Part 3 of 3

Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese – Part 3 of 3

The study found that 63 percent of those cases were in children younger than 10 years. An 11-month-old infant died from complications of an E coli infection, while another babe drinking raw milk was sickened by E coli and then by salmonella a year later. “Over three-quarters of children 5 years of mature or younger were being served raw milk from their own farm or a relative’s farm.

Even at your own farm where you know the cows – where living souls know the farm and maybe are taking really good care of those animals – children can still get sick. Robinson said people should think long and hard before giving raw dairy products to their kids. Glode agreed. “There’s no sign to support that raw milk is healthier, and there’s a lot of evidence to support that it’s easy for it to become contaminated, with no one intending to do it moines. We need to protect issue children as much as possible”.

Parts: 1 2 3


Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese. Part 2 of 3

Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese – Part 2 of 3

One raw-milk advocate said the danger of related illness is overstated. “We’ve been tracking these numbers for quite some time. There are an average of 50 reported illnesses each year from unprocessed milk, with 10 million drinkers of raw milk, so the percentage of illnesses is extremely low,” said Sally Fallon Morell, president of the Weston A Price Foundation, a nonprofit nutrition upbringing group that supports the sale of raw milk. “We think it’s a mountain out of a molehill. Those numbers clash with data gathered by the CDC, however.


In the era from 1998 to 2011, the reported outbreaks resulted in nearly 2400 illnesses, 284 hospitalizations and two deaths. That’s an average of roughly 200 people sickened each year by raw dairy products. And those were just cases linked to the outbreaks. Health officials assert an outbreak when at least two people get sick from the same food. Outbreaks don’t count so-called sporadic cases, when individuals savvy food poisoning but it’s not linked to any other cases.

Last week, researchers in Minnesota estimated the number of sporadic cases of food poisoning in their state linked to raw dairy products and found they unquestionably dwarf those tied to outbreaks. In a study published Dec 11, 2013 in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases, researchers found that, over a decade, 21 hoi polloi got food poisoning in five outbreaks linked to raw dairy products. But 530 additional individual cases were reported to the state, said study author Trisha Robinson, an epidemiologist with the Minnesota Department of Health.

Those were cases of lab-confirmed victuals poisoning caused by Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, E coli or Salmonella bacteria in which people had also reported consuming raw milk. “There are a lot more folk who are consuming raw milk who aren’t part of an outbreak and they’re getting sick too. Outbreaks are really just the tip of the iceberg”. Given that many cases of foodborne illness are never caught or reported, Robinson estimated about 17 percent of proletariat who drank raw milk over the 10 years of the study got sick from it.

Parts: 1 2 3

Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese. Part 1 of 3

Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese – Part 1 of 3

Some Danger Of Milk And Cheese. In a inexperienced position statement, US pediatricians say raw milk and cheeses are simply too risky for infants, children and teeming women. The statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics, published online Dec 16, 2013 in the journal Pediatrics, urges parents not to let their kids drink unpasteurized wring or eat cheese made from it. The doctors also called for a ban on the sale of all raw-milk products in the United States. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 148 outbreaks due to consumption of plain milk or raw-milk products were reported to the agency between 1998 and 2011.

Raw milk is milk that hasn’t been pasteurized, or briefly heated to at least 161 degrees Fahrenheit to bump harmful germs. Before milk began being widely pasteurized in the United States in the 1920s, it routinely made people sick. Raw milk can harbor bacteria that cause tuberculosis and diphtheria, as well as the germs that cause spiteful bouts of stomach trouble such as Listeria and E coli, according to the US Food and Drug Administration.

Children are more susceptible to these illnesses than adults, and they tend to get the worst of the complications, such as unannounced and sometimes life-threatening kidney failure. Illnesses tied to raw milk also can cause miscarriages in pregnant women. “Pasteurization is one of the major public-health advances of the century. It’s a shame not to board advantage of that,” said Dr Mary Glode, a professor of pediatric infectious disease at Children’s Hospital Colorado, in Aurora.

Yet as more people embrace locally produced foods, raw-milk products have proficient a surge in popularity. Fans say it tastes better and that it might protect kids from developing allergies and asthma, although there’s little research to back up those claims. It also costs a pretty penny. With consumers agreeable to fork over $7 to $14 a gallon, dairies are pushing state legislatures to ease restrictions on the sale of raw milk as a way to save cash-strapped blood farms.

Parts: 1 2 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation. Part 3 of 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation – Part 3 of 3

But such initiatives have already angered advocates of smokers’ rights and are likely to do so again. A promote study in the same issue of Pediatrics found that as smoke-free laws get tougher, kids’ asthma symptoms, though not asthma rates, are declining.

Researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health examined US health figures from 1999 to 2006, and found a 33 percent decline in symptoms, including persistent wheeze and chronic night cough, among kids who weren’t exposed to smoke. Prior research from the same crowd had found that tougher laws were also linked with lower cotinine levels in children and adolescents, down about 60 percent between 2003 and 2006 in children living in smoke-free homes energy. According to the study authors, 73 percent of US residents are now covered by smoke-free laws.

Parts: 1 2 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation. Part 2 of 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation – Part 2 of 3

But a pre-eminent limitation of the study is that the authors couldn’t separate other potential sources of exposure, such as family members who only smoked outside but might carry particles indoors on their clothes. Nor did it take into relation day-care centers or other forms of child care that might contribute to smoke exposure.


Even so “It’s critical that we take additional action to protect our children from secondhand smoke,” especially in light of a recent arrive from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stating that more than half of children aged 3-11 are exposed to secondhand smoke. “Some municipalities, especially in California and Washington, have started moving close to restricting smoking in multi-unit housing, and in New York City some private apartment buildings and condominium complexes have banned smoking”.

Noting that some consider a smoking ban in apartments an infringement upon adverse rights and privacy, the authors say the civil liberties argument only holds if the smoke has no impact on one’s neighbors. “We also feel very strongly that if we’re going to be putting restrictions on smoking in people’s homes – we be in want of to be sure we have the resources in place for smokers to either cut down or smoke in other places”.

Parts: 1 2 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation. Part 1 of 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation – Part 1 of 3

Passive Smoking Of Children Is Possible Through General Ventilation. Children who remain in smoke-free apartments but have neighbors who light up suffer from exposure to smoke that seeps through walls or shared ventilation systems, restored research shows. Compared to kids who live in detached homes, apartment-dwelling children have 45 percent more cotinine, a marker of tobacco exposure, in their blood, according to a work published in the January issue of Pediatrics. Although this study didn’t look at whether the health of the children was compromised, previous studies have shown physiologic changes, including cognitive disruption, with increased levels of cotinine, even at the lowest levels of exposure, said workroom author Dr Karen Wilson.

And “We think that this research supports the efforts of people who have already been moving so as to approach banning smoking in multi-unit housing in their own communities,” added Wilson, an assistant professor of pediatrics at Golisano Children’s Hospital at the University of Rochester Medical Center in New York. Vince Willmore, sin president of communications at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, agreed. “This study demonstrates the importance of implementing smoke-free policies in multi-unit housing and of parents adopting smoke-free policies in all homes”. Since smoke doesn’t hinder in one place, Willmore said only comprehensive smoke-free policies provide effective protection.

The authors analyzed data from a subject survey of 5002 children between 6 and 18 years old who lived in nonsmoking homes. The children lived in detached houses, attached homes and apartments, which allowed the researchers to take if cotinine levels varied by types of housing. About three-quarters of children living in any kind of housing had been exposed to secondhand smoke, but apartment dwellers had 45 percent more cotinine in their blood than residents of uninvolved houses. For white apartment residents, the difference was even more startling: a 212 percent increase vs 46 percent in blacks and no increase in other races or ethnicities.

Parts: 1 2 3

The Health Of Children Born Prematurely. Part 3 of 3

The Health Of Children Born Prematurely – Part 3 of 3

Rates of unfledged birth in Sweden for singletons and twins conceived with fertility treatments dropped from nearly 28 percent between 1988 and 1992 to 13 percent between 2003 and 2007. Similar declines were seen in the other countries, the chew over found. The investigators also found that the number of twin births from fertility treatments dropped by nearly half between 1989 and 2007.

So “We have improved both the technical skills in the laboratory and the clinical skills of the doctors and also put on milder ovarian stimulation”. She added that hormonal treatments and the lab techniques have also gotten better ed treatment medicine. “These findings show convincingly that while there has been a considerable increase in assisted production cycles over the past 20 years, this has been accompanied by a significant improvement in health outcomes for these babies, particularly for singleton babies.

Parts: 1 2 3